From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 1 21:28:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA12644 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 21:28:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA12639 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 21:28:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA11248; Sun, 1 Mar 1998 21:25:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803020525.VAA11248@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: John Birrell cc: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Mar 1998 14:37:31 +1100." <199803020337.OAA10460@cimlogic.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 01 Mar 1998 21:25:54 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > John S. Dyson wrote: > > It seems that we'll have ELF support, > > but I forget (or simply don't know) if we (they) decided that ELF will be > > primary or not. > > Has anyone decided what the aout to elf upgrade procedure will be? That's likely to come out of the bruises that the 'early adopters' are going to wear, but I would say that the initial approach will be "set BINFORMAT=elf and rebuild the world". -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message