From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 05:51:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F0D16A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:51:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E03A43D41 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616175D39; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41709-10; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-50-112.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.50.112]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8BB5CEC; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <420AF652.7040308@mac.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:14 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> <68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd@beforever.com> <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> <20050209.082507.35867907.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050209.082507.35867907.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:51:29 -0000 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> > Robert Joosten writes: >:> Besides, it sounds like CVSUP will soon be replaced by something >:> much more efficient. >: >: http://subversion.tigris.org/ ? > > He said something more efficient. cvsup is extremely efficient in > using all the bandwidth available to it, in both directions. > subversion, while it has many other virtues, hasn't optimized the > transport layer to such a large extent... A good point. On the other hand, Subversion removes the need to perform network access to do common operations like diff and annotate. That's invaluable for people who use a laptop while commuting and are w/o network access for a time. -- -Chuck