From owner-freebsd-net  Sun Feb 11 10:50:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AF06B37B491; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f1BIoRZ01014;
	Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:50:27 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, jlemon@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: somaxconn and foot removal
Message-ID: <20010211105027.P3274@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20010211015516.J3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <200102111828.NAA09777@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200102111828.NAA09777@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:28:52PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

* Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> [010211 10:29] wrote:
> <<On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:55:16 -0800, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> said:
> 
> > A) So, do we bump the sockets to use 'int' for so->so_qlimit?
> 
> Make it be `u_short'.  (Actually, I'm not sure why all three of those
> members aren't unsigned.  It would make more sense that way.)

This still gives misleading results from sysctl, ie sysctl allows
setting to 65539 which results in a real somaxconn of 3.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message