From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 08:17:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B57F5C; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635D87EA; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.31.9.217] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2883A43C9B; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:17:26 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54BE0F14.5030304@marino.st> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:17:24 +0100 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev , Adam Weinberger Subject: Re: svn commit: r377495 - head/textproc/py-pygments References: <201501200412.t0K4CVOj052563@svn.freebsd.org> <20150120081220.GB57237@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150120081220.GB57237@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:17:34 -0000 On 1/20/2015 09:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:12:31AM +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> New Revision: 377495 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/377495 >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r377495/ >> >> Log: >> Update to 2.0.1. >> >> [...] >> -OPTIONS_DEFINE= DOCS >> - > > Commit log does not mention this change, was it intended? If so, what was > the reason behind it? > The line is redundant -- it's presence or absence doesn't change anything. You know how I write commit messages and thus know I agree it could have been mentioned given how short the message was (if it were 1 of 100 changes I wouldn't have mentioned it myself). John