Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:01:05 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libc size Message-ID: <20021031080105.GA77041@tara.freenix.org> In-Reply-To: <3DC06EB1.CCF3B30D@mindspring.com> References: <20021030233106.32D292A896@canning.wemm.org> <3DC06EB1.CCF3B30D@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Terry Lambert: > The PIC overhead is likely unavoidable. I'd actually like to see > the "benchmark" run on statically linked PIC vs. non-PIC code, so I remember that when I was working on Perl and the FreeBSD port (back in the early 5.000 days), having libperl shared was adding a fairly large overhead. "make test" ran in between 15% and 25% more time in the shared libperl case... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021031080105.GA77041>