Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 23:17:37 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ports/36080: Support USE_OPENSSL=yes on 4.2 Message-ID: <20020318231737.A83256@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <nHFr2KdQfx@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>; from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:06:03AM %2B0100 References: <200203190511.g2J5BR919708@freefall.freebsd.org> <200203190511.g2J5BR919708@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020318211645.A80096@xor.obsecurity.org> <nHFr2KdQfx@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:06:03AM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote >=20 > > I don't like this..can you explain more about the problem you're > > trying to solve? >=20 > sure ... > People install openssh from ports. > 1) cause they didn't isntaleld the crypto realese > 2) cause they want use features of the newer Openssh >=20 > I tweeked the ports so they uses the openssl lib from ports. > With this change, other application like stunnel can > be build against the newer version of SSL too. This doesn't address my question..what, specifically, is the problem with the older openssl? Kris --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8luYQWry0BWjoQKURAgYMAJ90szdcC6NoxmI4FjsdmHLJTngcRwCcDeYO J7pUbfh/fSYZqcw2DFa2R90= =AkRt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020318231737.A83256>