From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 13:36:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DC116A4CF for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:36:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F8443D46 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23DBC4983D; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:36:57 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: iYWpljVVg3GePCU24Wd2hw 1104845817 Received: from gumby.localhost (dsl-80-41-102-250.access.uk.tiscali.com [80.41.102.250]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1EB57035A; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:36:53 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: Stijn Hoop , Dave Horsfall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:36:50 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050104125803.GA46516@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050104125803.GA46516@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501041336.51258.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:36:59 -0000 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:58, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:46:48PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > > direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html > > > > And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody > > hoops do we have to jump through? > > You really do not want to compile OpenOffice if you're not willing to jump > through hoops. It is the biggest beast in the ports tree afaik. > > That said, there is a WITHOUT_JAVA knob for it. Try that and see if you > need to jump through this particular hoop again. Try it, but I suspect it wont help. jdk is optional for running OO, but I think building it requires a java-based build tool.