From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 20:47:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21D916A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60A713C4CC for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AA310E64B; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:19:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IyKgVLCDFV0P; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:19:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FC110E647; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:19:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:19:47 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.3) Professional Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <955937027.20080120211947@rulez.sk> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith In-Reply-To: <47938F21.6020308@math.missouri.edu> References: <479388C0.50507@highperformance.net> <47938F21.6020308@math.missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re[2]: Scheduler in Various Docs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:47:50 -0000 Hello Stephen, Sunday, January 20, 2008, 7:12:49 PM, you wrote: > Jason C. Wells wrote: >> The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with >> information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental. >> The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say ULE is the >> new recommended scheduler. >> >> If ULE is in fact the current recommendation, then a few docs need to be >> updated. > To add to Jason's point - why does GENERIC still default to SCHED_4BSD? Actually, 8.0-CURRENT has the SCHED_ULE scheduler set as default. > Are there plans to change this before 7.0 is truly released? No, this will not be changed for 7.0, but it's planned for 7.1. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org