From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 18 00:16:35 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DCFF9AB
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72251C69
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1I0GZE6015800
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:16:35 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 197775] net/rtpproxy
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:16:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: euan@potensol.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-197775-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:16:35 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197775

            Bug ID: 197775
           Summary: net/rtpproxy
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: euan@potensol.com

Created attachment 153129
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153129&action=edit
patch diff for the port net/rtpproxy. Taken from path "/usr/ports/net".

The BEFORE directive in the rc.d script needs 'kamailo' appended to it. Since
openser and ser are no loger in ports tree, they've been replaced by
net/kamailio.

There needs to be a way to define the control socket for rtpproxy daemon. The
below is sufficient:

+rtpproxy_ctrl_socket=${rtpproxy_ctrl_socket:-"udp:0.0.0.0:7722"}
-command_args="-l ${rtpproxy_laddr} -p /var/run/rtpproxy.pid"
+command_args="-u ${rtpproxy_usr}:${rtpproxy_grp} -l ${rtpproxy_laddr} -s
${rtpproxy_ctrl_socket} -p /var/run/rtpproxy.pid"

I've included the patch diff for these changes in attachment.

I would be happy to take maintainership of this port, since I have a vested
interest in kamailio, which has rtpproxy as a dependency. However I am not a
qualified ports maintainer yet. I intend to be one soon, in order to submit a
working www/sogo port.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.