From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 10 01:46:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA22752 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 01:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d210.ndiasb.kiev.ua (d210.ndiasb.kiev.ua [194.44.4.27]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA22207; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 01:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uu.elvisti.kiev.ua (acc0.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.132]) by d210.ndiasb.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00390; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:46:02 +0300 Received: from office.elvisti.kiev.ua (office.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.129]) by uu.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA19216; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:45:29 +0300 (EET DST) Received: (from stesin@localhost) by office.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.ElVisti) id LAA17470; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:45:29 +0300 From: "Andrew V. Stesin" Message-Id: <199606100845.LAA17470@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> Subject: Re: The -stable problem: my view To: narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee (Narvi) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:45:24 +0300 (EET DST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, karl@mcs.com, grog@lemis.de, hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Narvi" at Jun 8, 96 12:53:38 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, # 2) Couldn't maintaining of stable look like: # a) The core team suggest that it would be nice if somebody would # bring feature x over to -stable. if the feature mentioned is "new" -- than -stable can't be officially called "stable" any more. If it isn't -- why waste time of those great guys who are making FreeBSD? Donate your own time to do testing if you want to get more features, isn't it Ok? -- With best regards -- Andrew Stesin. +380 (44) 2760188 +380 (44) 2713457 +380 (44) 2713560 "You may delegate authority, but not responsibility." Frank's Management Rule #1.