From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Mar 9 13:42:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3591505B for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 13:42:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA15645; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 14:41:46 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990309142131.00ca2cc0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 14:41:13 -0700 To: Wes Peters , "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Ports Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <36E58F52.EDE01EF4@softweyr.com> References: <67162.921011604@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:14 PM 3/9/99 -0700, Wes Peters wrote: >Nor should it. My point, as well as those of the others in this dicussion, >is that the current scheme is NOT broken, it just is. It's easy to say "it's not broken" until you attempt to bring in a port, for a version of the OS that was released very recently, and find out that it's an old version that has a security hole. A system that doesn't make it easy to do what makes sense -- that is, to keep the ports for recently released OS versions current -- is broken, or at the very least has a real problem. >I'm sure you are as >tired as the rest of us of Brett's impassioned pleas to spoon-feed him >everything he needs to run his business with no consideration given back. Give me a break. The two most recent offers I've made to "give back" have been rejected. One of these -- an offer to devote a bunch of time to getting FreeBSD running on IBM Netfinity servers -- was rejected rather capriciously. Such treatment doesn't exactly make folks feel as if contributions are welcome. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message