Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:31:53 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em network issues Message-ID: <2a41acea0610181531y732cd5sa7bf733cc445491c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170610181523t6d240839i887632d6d7576762@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0610181046k822afd1qcec4187dc8514187@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170610181523t6d240839i887632d6d7576762@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/18/06, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a Sun T2000 that I generally run with the em driver from as of > July in order to avoid watchdog timeouts. One trivial scenario that > reproduces the problem with 100% consistency is running the ghc > configure script (a 20kloc shell script) over NFS. As the T2000 > doesn't exactly represent "typical" PC hardware it may not be the most > desirable test platform. Nonetheless, let me know if you're > interested. > Thanks for looking into this issue. > > -Kip I'm a bit confused from the way you worded this, do you have watchdogs with em, or you use em to avoid them? If you have problems when running NFS then thats a clue, is it TCP or UDP based NFS? I am interested, give me details about the setup please. I have one of the engineers in our test organization trying to repro symptoms on a system installed with BETA2, it has shared interrupts between em and usb. Any additional stuff he could run would be helpful. Thanks, Jack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0610181531y732cd5sa7bf733cc445491c>