Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:29:35 -0400 From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ? Message-ID: <16738.45007.276964.761754@canoe.dclg.ca> In-Reply-To: <41605C2C.8050004@freebsd.org> References: <20041003124353.29822.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> <41605C2C.8050004@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> writes: Tim> /stand is largely defunct. It is, I believe, still used to Tim> bootstrap the CD-ROM installation, but has no particular purpose Tim> after that point. I was always confused with sysinstall being in /stand. I always understood /stand as executables that ran from the loader. The "standalone environment." Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16738.45007.276964.761754>