Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:05:56 +0000 From: "Igor Mozolevsky" <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no> Cc: njl@freebsd.org, bruno@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@digifonica.com> Subject: Re: powerd adaptive mode latching Message-ID: <a2b6592c0801160805u396675dftebfbe7abe6a8e193@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86wsq9kbkw.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <a2b6592c0801110351l382959ffh1d55f2bcd2e6ca1b@mail.gmail.com> <a2b6592c0801111119r148d3697hf75a59b7bf74d540@mail.gmail.com> <478930D2.90806@digifonica.com> <200801161009.55401.jhb@freebsd.org> <a2b6592c0801160727n106d8a69tc9d1068a062bf837@mail.gmail.com> <86wsq9kbkw.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16/01/2008, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > "Igor Mozolevsky" <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> writes: > > That could be something to do with the rate of throttling of powerd; I > > can't remember how long it was exactly, but under the default setting > > it would take powerd 9s to go from 100MHz to full clock speed [...] > > Do you really have 18 steps, or did you have a higher ival? > > Have you tried setting ival to something like 100 ms? Yup, there's 18 steps (if I recall correctly, don't have my laptop on me) :-) I've got my ival at 50ms, but the point I was making was that jhb's results were not surprising if he'd used defaults. Igor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a2b6592c0801160805u396675dftebfbe7abe6a8e193>