Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:21:11 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/Subversive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr Message-ID: <20070215222111.GA45309@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org> References: <200702141652.l1EGqeZV047261@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070215095351.GA34667@FreeBSD.org> <45D4337A.8080302@FreeBSD.org> <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org> <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:54:49PM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Ideally, yes. But we can start by not adding new ones :) > > Of course, but those ports are misleading. I'd never committed a port > with the first letter upper-case if there weren't already others 0:-) > Said so, should the PORTNAME be modified as well or is the port > directory enough? Why not read what the porter's handbook has to say? ;-) Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070215222111.GA45309>