From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 25 13:39:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA23604 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 13:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fly.HiWAAY.net (dkelly@fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA23599 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fly.HiWAAY.net; (8.8.6/1.1.8.2/21Sep95-1003PM) id PAA17967; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:39:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:39:08 -0500 (CDT) From: David Kelly Message-Id: <199707252039.PAA17967@fly.HiWAAY.net> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: NetBSD binary compatibility? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Learned the Introl 68HC11 C compiler was now available for NetBSD so I downloaded the demo at http://www.introl.com/ and have had a go at it. Grumpy: {1090} pwd /usr/home/dkelly/public_html/code/i386-netbsd/bin Grumpy: {1091} ./cc11 Bad magic: ld.so Grumpy: {1092} (You'll notice its in my Apache directory because the docs are html and I thought it'd be more fun to let Apache serve them than copy them to the Mac. Grumpy has an MGA monitor that is only turned on in an emergency.) So, what am I doing wrong? Should I push for a native FreeBSD version? Do I need NetBSD's ld.so and associated libraries? -- David Kelly N4HHE dkelly@hiwaay.net ====================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.