Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:02:10 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Tom Jones <thj@freebsd.org> Cc: Zhenlei Huang <zlei.huang@gmail.com>, Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too aggressive TCP ACKs Message-ID: <18e16e34-b750-9fb1-c7d2-bfc6f0b3fadd@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <Y1j2ZzHaFt/YA5Et@spacemonster> References: <75D35F36-7759-4168-ADBA-C2414F5B53BC@gmail.com> <712641B3-5196-40CC-9B64-04637F16F649@lurchi.franken.de> <62A0DD30-B3ED-48BE-9C01-146487599092@gmail.com> <0FED34A9-D093-442A-83B7-08C06D11F8B5@lurchi.franken.de> <330A9146-F7CC-4CAB-9003-2F90B872AC3E@gmail.com> <1ed66217-5463-fd4d-7e7a-58d9981bc44c@selasky.org> <Y1j2ZzHaFt/YA5Et@spacemonster>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/26/22 10:57, Tom Jones wrote: > It focuses on QUIC, but congestion control dynamics don't change with > the protocol. You should be able to read there, but if not I'm happy to > send anyone a pdf. If QUIC doesn't support TSO (Large Send Offload), it cannot be compared I think. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18e16e34-b750-9fb1-c7d2-bfc6f0b3fadd>