From nobody Wed Feb 15 13:19:03 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PGzDl4mgHz3q4Qr for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PGzDl2s9jz4LPd for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1676467143; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k+ko+JmiTC4UiNVyu8sYNt1PISMVwN4mmllRW4y2+TE=; b=fwCeQ1sWGCSpDF42eBZ4yH/LGXTu37610vhNNR6wY9oZoE2q2AId6RaNWDHlDReH+WgDxe 2onFvCGZscFgnBLQKs4jxXendRWoRfzZkiQX446HAf7EuvEyQHacCG0jZC+Mg7DRYXacLl kqV/DjrLYRdqOJ2QOoMI4lPYizVWnChXLPL0JL0TBaA6t51d/WtEj2IVq2uPcqJcvRKYXf sLzGY+IETeJCgNjtMSr1cF2mohc3FrPb/xwFhNF2/kC/xQyYHvFDkz3yJOPihqD+zEji82 /M/eCOLXOmqLGx3KUYV/OYfU5b62lmhZpU8L+dyYwCLuma2f/QleuOTA1T1E+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1676467143; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bJTexfbchY2LrGWw0rf3nxYlwn1/mfrqg9s6sBHzCZeSG4IhW6rtMhVhG00+Ukvx9QUnSc xHwFXMjs1XQGnKhEV2v5/vrLRWM/r7Ks23aR0mOZSKq9DlfZyepkJqvLfXnIukaU0dRIi8 PTY4T8Who8oOLOq2K+MJjUFhxLaFzFn6SZ0+74vhK1hPuDH66rxxORYGNtQjewLU2EfUvV ncXKw4hHto2UVpU/fVEWNK2fgBPiMOquLWMq7I8b1hf7KQqLMfxfa9cjyT8ZZhBlO4O8hK l4wCnkvHUHnB4bNPqT4xnv88GB3BgNLpkc87T4NwceTEzGSVQp5e0TfqV6L2Fg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PGzDl1x7FzQHp for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 31FDJ3Om096718 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:19:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 31FDJ3Hg096717 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:19:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268490] [igb] [lagg] [vlan]: Intel i210 performance severely degraded Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:19:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.4-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: duerrd561@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268490 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Duerr --- (In reply to Kevin Bowling from comment #3) Ok, I completed the bisect process you outlined above -- thanks again for t= he great instructions. Here's the output: 6486e9dd8d24b0195facd23d8ca82e17e180cffb is the first bad commit commit 6486e9dd8d24b0195facd23d8ca82e17e180cffb Author: Eric Joyner Date: Mon Sep 21 22:52:57 2020 +0000 MFC r365774 and r365776 These two commits fix issues in em(4)/igb(4): - Fix define and includes with RSS option enabled - Properly retain promisc flag in init PR: 249191, 248869 MFC after: 1 day sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c | 2 +- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) On the first commit I tested, performance was normal/awesome: [root@nfs dd]# iperf -s ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 1] local 172.27.6.135 port 5001 connected with 172.27.6.129 port 54394 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.10 GBytes 942 Mbits/sec [ 2] local 172.27.6.135 port 5001 connected with 172.27.6.129 port 53705 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 2] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec [ 3] local 172.27.6.135 port 5001 connected with 172.27.6.129 port 64390 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.12 GBytes 958 Mbits/sec Every commit after that, starting with the first bad commit listed above, performance was terrible: [root@nfs dd]# iperf -s ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 1] local 172.27.6.135 port 5001 connected with 172.27.6.129 port 64164 [ 2] local 172.27.6.135 port 5001 connected with 172.27.6.129 port 65279 [ 3] local 172.27.6.135 port 5001 connected with 172.27.6.129 port 42346 recv failed: Connection reset by peer [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 1] 0.00-79.38 sec 60.0 Bytes 6.05 bits/sec ^CWaiting for server threads to complete. Interrupt again to force quit. [ 2] 0.00-56.63 sec 60.0 Bytes 8.48 bits/sec [ 3] 0.00-36.26 sec 60.0 Bytes 13.2 bits/sec [SUM] 0.00-95.55 sec 180 Bytes 15.1 bits/sec --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=