From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 18:53:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC2816A41F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7E543D55 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF491A3C27 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A2EF0511DB; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:53:15 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20051017185315.GA94004@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <200510171505.j9HF5YQU030521@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510171505.j9HF5YQU030521@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:53:16 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Brett Glass wrote: > > The release schedule for FreeBSD 6.0, on the FreeBSD Web site, doesn't= show a > > projected date for the finished product. How close is it? >=20 > I can't speak for the RE team, but from watching the BETA > and RC progress and reports in the mailing lists ... my > guess is that 6.0-RELEASE will be out very soon. Maybe in > only a few days. >=20 > > We are (believe it > > or not) still running and building production servers with 4.11, >=20 > Same here. >=20 > > We're running our own tests on RC1, but don't have a lot of spare serv= ers to > > try it on. So, it's worth asking: How stable is RC1 turning out to be = on > > uniprocessor platforms? On SMP platforms? How is network and disk per= formance > > relative to 4.11? (When we tested 5.x, both network and file system > > performance were worse than that of 4.11.) >=20 > FWIW, I'm running RELENG_6 on two machines (a notebook and > a server) for several weeks, updating every few days, and > putting some workload and various testing on them. So far > I have not encountered any serious problems that were not > resolved. So, stability seems to be very good; my feeling > is that 6.0 will be a _lot_ better than 5.0. A _lot_. Don't let the .0 confuse you. 6.0 is nothing *AT ALL* like 5.0 in terms of development history and quality. Kris --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDU/MbWry0BWjoQKURAgaRAKDUIjYAWyCRYnT8FjfPDcc6bHnP2wCg+/gi RF5NJ2B+2EPMQjX/Ky58KkY= =ouhx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--