From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 09:47:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF27916A4BF for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5045243FEA for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7MGldQX072207; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7MGlY7w072206; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:34 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mike Makonnen Message-ID: <20030822164734.GA71360@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Mike Makonnen , Bruce M Simpson , arch@FreeBSD.org References: <20030821161114.GA7094@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org> <20030821165906.GB6266@kokeb.ambesa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030821165906.GB6266@kokeb.ambesa.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Bruce M Simpson cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:47:41 -0000 On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:59:06PM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > What do people think? Can we loose these type of warnings? I'm not sure > > > what their need is. The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for > > > > > > I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere? > > Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch? > > I already took care of this a couple of days ago. thanks!