From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Apr 28 10:00:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA24425 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.dialix.com [192.203.228.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA24399 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM with ESMTP id AAA21063; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:59:07 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199704281659.AAA21063@spinner.DIALix.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: mef@cs.washington.edu cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 1997 09:25:44 MST." <199704281625.JAA17644@wile-e-coyote.cs.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:59:06 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk mef@cs.washington.edu wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 04:49:18 -0400 (EDT) > From: Ben Black > from > http://www.microsoft.com/syspro/technet/boes/bo/winntas/technote/nt101.htm > Windows NT Workstation supports up to two processors in a symmetric > multiprocessing environment. > > According to that document NT Workstation can only support two > processors, but NT Server can support four processors. I wouldn't be > surprised if embedded in the code there was some sort of check: > if (ms->makemoremoney->is_nt_server == TRUE) { > /* support four processors */ > } > > :) Yes, that's been fairly well established already. There have been several technical articles about how the NT4 Workstation kernel is identical to the Server version. The article that I'm thinking of described how a certain registry entry controlled what mode the machine ran in. NT3.5 allowed this to change, but NT4 has some process running to reset it back. The article described how they patched something or other to stop the watcher process/thread/whatever and change it, and reboot, and a NT4 Workstation becomes a server, and benchmarks just like a server, etc. Hmm.. Lemmesee... The tech details: http://software.ora.com/news/ms_internet_andrews.html The collection of information about other anti-competitive things M$ have done with NT4: http://software.ora.com/news/ms_internet_frame.html BTW, There are apparently three values.. WinNT, ServerNT and ``LanmanNT''.. Hmm.. The last one, I wonder what that is? > M Cheers, -Peter