From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 27 6:14: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4B437B401 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.neotext.ca (h24-70-64-200.ed.shawcable.net [24.70.64.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5048243E8A for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:13:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@babayaga.neotext.ca) Received: from babayaga.neotext.ca (localhost.neotext.ca [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.neotext.ca (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8RDFZi0008059; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:15:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@babayaga.neotext.ca) From: "Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu" To: Duncan Campbell , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, mailman@crypton.pl Subject: Re: kern.ps_showallprocs and procfs Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:15:35 -0600 Message-Id: <20020927131535.M11061@babayaga.neotext.ca> In-Reply-To: <200209271254.GAA18796@tagish.taiga.ca> References: <200209271254.GAA18796@tagish.taiga.ca> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 1.70 20020712 X-OriginatingIP: 127.0.0.1 (freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I should have added also that this is an antique debate ;-) > I tend to regard procfs as something of a debugging > tool. If you limit it as is probably necessary to > do what you suggest, its value as a tool becomes degraded. > > Duihb > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of > the message Duncan Patton a Campbell is Duihb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message