From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Oct 16 15:13:47 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A5310D66F9 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B785D70C19 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w9GFDPQI071556; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:13:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w9GFDPCA071555; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:13:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201810161513.w9GFDPCA071555@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Why SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <8A9D0204-17A7-480D-AD51-58A518AE6E27@yahoo.com> To: Mark Millard Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:13:24 -0700 (PDT) CC: Sebastian Huber , FreeBSD X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:13:47 -0000 > On 2018-Oct-15, at 10:25 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > it seems the master list of SPDX Identifiers is maintained by the Linux Foundation and not OSI: > > > > https://spdx.org/licenses/ > > > > The BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD is there: > > > > https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD.html > > And it does not agree with the other 2, listing from the above > first: > > PROVIDED BY THE FREEBSD PROJECT > IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FREEBSD PROJECT OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE > > (yep: no "AND CONTRIBUTORS" for the first line that I listed) > > vs. > > PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS > IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE > > vs. > > PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS > IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE > > > Messy. (I've not double checked the rest of the wording.) And this is why ultimately SPDX tagging should leave the original license in a file in place, this dis-joint nature creates space for these types of problems. Rather simple to just not have them and leave the license in the file as has been done for 30 years. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org