From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 6 15:22:31 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 15:22:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (tun.AwfulHak.org [194.242.139.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A9D37B400; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB6NJ3m16686; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:19:03 GMT (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB6NLlt08622; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 23:21:47 GMT (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200012062321.eB6NLlt08622@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Daniel Eischen , Brian Somers , Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads in the base system In-Reply-To: Message from "Jacques A. Vidrine" of "Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:53:34 CST." <20001206165334.D64011@spawn.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 23:21:47 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:50:29PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > I was just [re]thinking about this. When we get libpthread (work > > has just started on this), then libc_r will eventually go away. > > It's not clear yet whether libpthread will exist as a separate > > entity or whether it will evolve from libc_r. > > For the ignorant (me), what is/will be the difference between libc_r and > libpthread? And me ! Besides, can't we put libpthread in libc_r's place when it goes away ? > Cheers, > -- > Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message