Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:07:23 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" <universite@ukr.net> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Prompt to synchronize two volumes ZFS Message-ID: <4DAD6CEB.4060101@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <3596CB9B-7996-404B-AD34-D3A8DFD67FD4@sarenet.es> References: <4DAC7811.3090407@ukr.net> <BANLkTinsvVzaY9yiQ5QvVGK7gg7cPFMRcA@mail.gmail.com> <4DAC96EA.8080505@ukr.net> <BANLkTim-zK1cgjbaqDFQfmXWNVD4rCLEkw@mail.gmail.com> <3596CB9B-7996-404B-AD34-D3A8DFD67FD4@sarenet.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
19.04.2011 11:15, Borja Marcos wrote: > Moreover, although ZFS receive seems to be robust in case a replication stream is interrupted, I find it much more safer to move the stream beforehand, and start the zfs receive with a complete stream. This is if there's a place on a remote server, and if not? How to transfer snapshots, then? -- Vladislav V. Prodan VVP24-UANIC +380[67]4584408 +380[99]4060508 vlad11@jabber.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DAD6CEB.4060101>