From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 16:20:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18C21065673 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702FA8FC1A for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FA09CB05F; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:19:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9VbBPcNrU++E; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:19:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A7D9CB07F; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:19:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0HGJYCS011915; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:19:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:19:34 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Message-ID: <20090117161934.GA11723@freebsd.org> References: <20090113215520.GA29635@freebsd.org> <20090113221127.GA31906@freebsd.org> <8663keymsk.fsf@ds4.des.no> <861vv2ymq9.fsf@ds4.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <861vv2ymq9.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: set C dialect when compiling world X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:20:13 -0000 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:29:50PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes: > >>> +. if !defined(CSTD) > >>> +CSTD = gnu89 > >>> +. endif > > What I meant to write here is that > > . if !defined(CSTD) > CSTD = gnu89 > . endif > > can simply be written as > > CSTD ?= gnu89 yes.. that was intended but I made a typo.... I have a new patch that I will present soon... sorry for the inconvenience