Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:25:37 -0700 From: matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090 Message-ID: <4F5D5091.6050807@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmondMGQzw91UyDx3-3%2BmqLOXLMncn-pvUR6NQm-YwhPsgg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BCYCL-d1hCzQK48EzPjgRu3UFO9EWMn-O%2B3V8%2B9cNrQE2s%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F41DDE8.6060004@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonaRy0HyaoborYg=CEbAwKGHXZooi8k5qC8781Pe7591A@mail.gmail.com> <4F48166A.5040301@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomQiwjH-nDmWJA=pg-gcgV9Djf0eCM940UvaXW_g030XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BCYCL-6=03MvCCKq4z5aePqLPWzjAQZmHAKDXwNA8f5Gawu7A@mail.gmail.com> <4F4828C0.6020705@gmail.com> <CA%2BCYCL_o=mDA-P66nTdPR65=MwML4FghxRpNzowDE-eXNWmD6g@mail.gmail.com> <4F5A8023.1090705@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmonu4SUVOdfbTdAnmGfQ=T-PtcAbd-PCoQ0PV_ttwF5Scw@mail.gmail.com> <4F5AC7CF.3090409@gmail.com> <4F5C0C86.7040503@gmail.com> <4F5C24ED.3090601@gmail.com> <4F5CD920.2000905@gmail.com> <4F5D0876.5040409@gmail.com> <4F5D14E0.3050301@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=jJmwY=bTVaKFYTd--1E9vzwgn54VMJyY82bc9pSWcBg@mail.gmail.com> <20120312001625.4d9b3b52.ray@ddteam.net> <CAJ-VmondMGQzw91UyDx3-3%2BmqLOXLMncn-pvUR6NQm-YwhPsgg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/11/12 17:26, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hiya, > > Remember how I said that you should submit things to commit to freebsd? :-) > > Let's not leave it living in the zrouter tree; let's get it into FreeBSD-HEAD. > > So please, do up a diff against -HEAD of your ralink driver changes > and lets get _something_ ASAP into the tree. > > Sheesh.. :-) > > > adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If you have a better one Aleksandr let's do it...I unearthed my old diff because there was still no support. Fundamentally, I agree with keeping things similar to OpenBSD. If the work is already done we should do that. In the mean time, if we don't have such a thing, we have something this way...I'm really just learning wireless kernel dev. I don't really have an "attachment" to this particular version, other than it worked for me and if it helped others :) I do feel that perhaps being synchronized with the current OpenBSD makes sense, but that it will be a while before I personally can figure out all the steps in porting their current code. Most is similar, but there are significant differences. Thanks! Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5D5091.6050807>