Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:23:08 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Matt Lager <mlager@sdunix.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF state key linking mismatch in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <7534A9A5-D901-43E2-A7D7-3F45699B2C91@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <4F0F4B94.10408@sdunix.com> References: <4F0F4B94.10408@sdunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12. Jan 2012, at 21:07 , Matt Lager wrote: > I've had a bug report in on this for a while but hasn't received a = response yet, also posted to the FreeBSD forums and haven't received a = response either, see these links: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/163208 > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D28278 >=20 > I don't believe it to be a configuration issue, and this is really = preventing me from using FreeBSD 9.0 as VPN endpoints. If anyone has any = information on this, I would greatly appreciate it. yeah it's the re-use of an mbuf that previously passed through pf. The = logging is noise basically though can be painful with a slow (serial) = console. I have a sysctl locally to disable the logging, OpenBSD has = removed the printf by now. I agree that we need to fix these places = where it still originates and even if it's for documentation purposes to = eventually decide if re-using the mbuf there is really cheaper to = allocating a new one as other people lately found transporting other = properties along with the mbuf and re-using that can lead to odd = results. /bz --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7534A9A5-D901-43E2-A7D7-3F45699B2C91>