From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 17 06:11:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF0A1065674 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6028FC15 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so123857obb.13 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:11:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lJkH5X0/iBVAqECpg74LUthTX7gG2uoAzrG6v6VIlKo=; b=S+LO831StOWArmnv58mMojd2rWNjSJXAtpPWaEjZe9tGkBRVq16/DbWYZuiVml2ORv pr1F+mQ0N/uKBkVuNDBDjuKpYVRiR/RMW70SsTrgCjU3Nj530fAPEi6diqAwrmYySjpk kD/b95AvxeufOUyQtLeevd2vidjzbfX9fywcM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=lJkH5X0/iBVAqECpg74LUthTX7gG2uoAzrG6v6VIlKo=; b=hosd4SsZYpmHVQGmkZGEVH/NITsu+bu/CO/wa0boINZ9jixR8uStb5fNAk5dWU6q3J bYczz8+5vjYl80gSSlscduE5kSGGavhTn+HMzkOFeESNg25DzvUmKzMEqJdsi8WUuYoY t0D4Uk91EHkCwuHGBpsbh2XXzBZXdcze1mzNcVmxUUFmg1Owv+5PSjgRi/V/BQA3N5tL w7+lhDkZz5k3Ykg9Xelg7/up2/kBf2JeDSZf5iOuVvl4HWVurSmuDdILRLdS3zipOXvR NMprB+18SsGyKySikyAZTUbK5i9SDoC+7vyOSaF4ToiGYWHvl58PB4duVbumx5nc7Kt5 obuA== Received: by 10.182.88.9 with SMTP id bc9mr1657599obb.4.1342505476038; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:11:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.125.70 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:10:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:10:45 -0700 Message-ID: To: Trent Nelson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8i0l0Owaam0F2zgaqsHQG6l250hWvfkzfS/HUgdgavqTFXXCt3rCT8OkR3K86S0+EtQjT Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: The MFC process... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:11:19 -0000 On 16 July 2012 22:35, Trent Nelson wrote: > On 7/16/12 11:19 PM, "Eitan Adler" wrote: > >>On 16 July 2012 19:33, Trent Nelson wrote: >>> >>> There are currently no automated MFC systems in place, correct? I.e. >>>the >>> onus is completely on the developer that made the change to head to >>>merge >>> back to stable? >> >>Correct. >> >>> Do the RELENG team do anything in particular to check >>> that changes for MFC actually make it back to stable? >> >>As far as I am aware, they do not. > > Sounds like a "what-hasn't-been-MFC'd-back-to-stable-yet" script could be > quite useful, then ;-) Of interest to me: if it could be limited to just the commits I made and optionally show me the log message and diff it would be very helpful. On a general note: be careful with any level of automation with this script though. Sometimes there are good reasons that a commit wasn't MFCed. -- Eitan Adler