From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jun 24 14:59:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6736037B407; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id E30075362; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:59:46 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? References: <20020622204229.GG53232@elvis.mu.org> <3D152EAA.DB201738@FreeBSD.org> <3D162074.A636B067@FreeBSD.org> <20020623140004.B79416@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020623142040.A89509@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020623150942.A867@dragon.nuxi.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 24 Jun 2002 23:59:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020623150942.A867@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David O'Brien" writes: > PAM modules used to not be versioned, however starting in -CURRENT > with OpenPAM they are now versioned. Also, unlike all other shared > objects, -CURRENT PAM modules do not have a non-versioned `.so' > symlink (nor will they ever). Thus it is safe to put all the > pam_*.so (non-versioned) into compat4x and our users' lives will be > easier. Absolutely correct, and my apologies for not stating this clearly. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message