Date: 24 Jun 2002 23:59:46 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? Message-ID: <xzpit48pcbx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020623150942.A867@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020622204229.GG53232@elvis.mu.org> <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D152EAA.DB201738@FreeBSD.org> <xzp660a16x9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D162074.A636B067@FreeBSD.org> <xzp6609zsbt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020623140004.B79416@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzphejty9vh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020623142040.A89509@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzp3cvdy8ae.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020623150942.A867@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes: > PAM modules used to not be versioned, however starting in -CURRENT > with OpenPAM they are now versioned. Also, unlike all other shared > objects, -CURRENT PAM modules do not have a non-versioned `.so' > symlink (nor will they ever). Thus it is safe to put all the > pam_*.so (non-versioned) into compat4x and our users' lives will be > easier. Absolutely correct, and my apologies for not stating this clearly. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpit48pcbx.fsf>