From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 16:56:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528DB16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED31443D53 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1167wra for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fzFTVTHguWJl+xirecSCOXWUSofvNon7dG2m2h/SRyB/Vk5rEzQRZXMazYA/nn2+5dfsG23J1WbjTACPTdI5VDqnmYMxfdSl708zpisuTNKiLdPi42sdFsCsG1JFlzNmrWKG924OR+OlaSs05oSoAF/gUhxhGHGW8Yq5nb4G8nU= Received: by 10.54.5.47 with SMTP id 47mr561825wre; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.82.4 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:55:25 -0500 From: Noel Jones To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200506012000.49914.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <0a6397740f09ea4ac7cce0b1bead3bde@chrononomicon.com> <20050601133325.6f5a11ac.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200506012000.49914.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: postgrey question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Noel Jones List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:56:06 -0000 On 6/1/05, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:44 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote: >=20 > > That's where I was a little confused (kirk? Insight, clarification?) > > because I thought that line would have it pass the message to another > > queue on port 10023 of the localhost, like the way Amavis runs. >=20 > That's correct. >=20 > > I didn't know if that meant it would be running three postfix queues no= w > > or if it is just a misunderstanding on my part. >=20 > Sort of, in a way, except that in theory any MTA (or other process) could= use > the amavis or postgrey ports, so they're not exactly Postfix-specific. > -- > Kirk Strauser >=20 >=20 >=20 The above is wrong. =20 The postfix policy service only passes the envelope information (client IP, HELO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO) to the policy daemon (postgrey in this instance), not the message itself, and expects a standard postfix access table action in reply, such as DEFER, REJECT, DUNNO, etc. No queue is involved. The postfix policy service is postfix-specific and not likely useful with other MTAs unless/until they specifically add support for this type of access map. This is very different from amavisd-new which expects to receive the entire message via SMTP from postfix. --=20 Noel Jones