From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Dec 22  9:30: 8 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5271553E
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:30:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA17950;
	Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:30:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199912221730.JAA17950@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org>
Subject: Re: ports/15423: update mail/nmh port to nmh-1.0.2 
Reply-To: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/15423; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Scott Blachowicz <Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/15423: update mail/nmh port to nmh-1.0.2 
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:24:06 -0800

 Hi-
 
 It's been brought to my attention that I goofed in constructing that patch. I
 removed the 'patches/patch-ad' file from the port, but that fact didn't make
 it into my submitted patch. I'm not sure how that normally gets handled (use
 'diff -N' to create patch & expect 'patch -E' to get used later?). Is there
 anything else I need to do at this point aside from sending this message?
 Should I resubmit a patch?
 
 Sorry,
 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org
 
 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org wrote:
 
 > 
 > >Number:         15423
 > >Category:       ports
 > >Synopsis:       update mail/nmh port to nmh-1.0.2
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Severity:       non-critical
 > >Priority:       low
 > >Responsible:    freebsd-ports
 > >State:          open
 > >Quarter:        
 > >Keywords:       
 > >Date-Required:
 > >Class:          change-request
 > >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 > >Arrival-Date:   Sat Dec 11 13:00:01 PST 1999
 > >Closed-Date:
 > >Last-Modified:
 > >Originator:     Scott Blachowicz
 > >Release:        FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386
 > >Organization:
 > none
 > >Environment:
 > 
 > 	FreeBSD
 > 
 > >Description:
 > 
 > 	Update port to most recent version of the nmh software. Following
 > 	changes made to port:
 > 
 > 	1) Updated to nmh-1.0.2 from nmh-1.0.
 > 	2) No longer have the added complexity of patching "-libdir"
 > 	   option to be "-libexecdir", since everything that gets
 > 	   installed to the nmh "libdir" need to go to "libexec".  Just
 > 	   set -libdir=PREFIX/libexec instead.
 > 	3) Now run autoconf via USE_AUTOCONF flag instead of trying to
 > 	   patch both autoconf input & output files.
 > 	4) Removed what appears to be an ineffective attempt to patch
 > 	   things to do FLOCK_LOCKING instead of DOT_LOCKING (when it
 > 	   should be using dot locking anyways).
 > 	5) Tweaked DESCR to make it more obvious this is a MUA package.
 > 
 > >How-To-Repeat:
 > 
 > 	
 > 
 > >Fix:
 > 	
 > 	Apply patch:
 > ...
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message