Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:13:48 +0200
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230545 - head/sys/boot/forth
Message-ID:  <4F21C20C.7000902@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F213EE7.2090207@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201201251836.q0PIa1sl037892@svn.freebsd.org> <4F205673.30907@FreeBSD.org> <4F206B8B.30207@FreeBSD.org> <4F2075AF.2030900@FreeBSD.org> <4F212F7F.3050301@FreeBSD.org> <4F213EE7.2090207@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 26/01/2012 13:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 26/01/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 01/25/2012 13:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 25/01/2012 22:52 Doug Barton said the following:
>>>> On 01/25/2012 11:22, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>> Besides, 'Safe Boot' seems to be already somewhat undermined by rc.d/kld.
>>>>
>>>> If there is a way to signal that down to userspace I'm happy to modify
>>>> the behavior of the script.
>>>
>>> Maybe this gets propagated via kenv.
>>
>> Sorry I wasn't clear. If you (or someone else) can show me how to
>> definitively determine, at the time that rc.d/kld is run, whether the
>> user chose the "Safe Boot" option I'm happy to change the behavior of
>> the script accordingly.
> 
> Boot with and without the option and compare kenv output?

Actually, please erase this part of the conversation from your memory :)
I was very wrong.  There is no relation between loader's 'Safe Boot' and
rc.d/kld.  Sorry.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F21C20C.7000902>