From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 21:13:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6933E106564A; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5288E8FC0C; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA04046; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:13:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RqWdh-000AB5-Gm; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:13:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4F21C20C.7000902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:13:48 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <201201251836.q0PIa1sl037892@svn.freebsd.org> <4F205673.30907@FreeBSD.org> <4F206B8B.30207@FreeBSD.org> <4F2075AF.2030900@FreeBSD.org> <4F212F7F.3050301@FreeBSD.org> <4F213EE7.2090207@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F213EE7.2090207@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r230545 - head/sys/boot/forth X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:13:52 -0000 on 26/01/2012 13:54 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 26/01/2012 12:48 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 01/25/2012 13:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 25/01/2012 22:52 Doug Barton said the following: >>>> On 01/25/2012 11:22, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>>> Besides, 'Safe Boot' seems to be already somewhat undermined by rc.d/kld. >>>> >>>> If there is a way to signal that down to userspace I'm happy to modify >>>> the behavior of the script. >>> >>> Maybe this gets propagated via kenv. >> >> Sorry I wasn't clear. If you (or someone else) can show me how to >> definitively determine, at the time that rc.d/kld is run, whether the >> user chose the "Safe Boot" option I'm happy to change the behavior of >> the script accordingly. > > Boot with and without the option and compare kenv output? Actually, please erase this part of the conversation from your memory :) I was very wrong. There is no relation between loader's 'Safe Boot' and rc.d/kld. Sorry. -- Andriy Gapon