From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jan 18 09:48:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9F4CB4492; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Received: from elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (mail.norma.perm.ru [IPv6:2a00:7540:1::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.norma.perm.ru", Issuer "Vivat-Trade UNIX Root CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF181C83; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Received: from bsdrookie.norma.com. ([IPv6:fd00::7af]) by elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v0I9mKKS035238 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:48:20 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=norma.perm.ru; s=key; t=1484732900; bh=VNCZm8mpxxUO8e/n8/e8MCAokyjSuC05SxtB9+PPF7o=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=cdaYlZsapSJ5URuQSkwWeyu2Ih7hSraiaFthPCby4dD5sLzp2w/r8EVsqJ3clIlWV wGt+7cFzHk36I8QKudvXpyEnxy4GwhVYgAV2t+8fmTWoqS0Qc2ZGha3gbCgng3RgDL nh90FHLVrlF4VyUfRlM269LR+pMBX6dnGBQ5jgcM= To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" Subject: decent 40G network adapters Message-ID: <587F39E3.1060608@norma.perm.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:48:19 +0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:48:26 -0000 Hi. Could someone recommend a decent 40Gbit adapter that are proven to be working under FreeBSD ? The intended purpose - iSCSI traffic, not much pps, but rates definitely above 10G. I've tried Supermicro-manufactured Intel XL710 ones (two boards, different servers - same sad story: packets loss, server unresponsive, spikes), seems like they have a problem in a driver (or firmware), and though Intel support states this is because the Supermicro tampered with the adapter, I'm still suspicious about ixl(4). I've also seen in the ML a guy reported the exact same problem with ixl(4) as I have found. So, what would you say ? Chelsio ? Thanks. Eugene.