From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 20:08:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9442516A46B for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga@stonehenge.sk) Received: from otana.stonehenge.sk (otana.stonehenge.sk [82.208.39.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA2B013C48A for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga@stonehenge.sk) Received: (qmail 56607 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2007 19:41:15 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on otana.stonehenge.sk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_PBL shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3 Received: from r6cb57.net.upc.cz (HELO ?10.0.100.2?) (secure@89.176.79.57) by otana.stonehenge.sk with SMTP; 23 Aug 2007 19:41:15 -0000 From: Michal Varga To: Roman Divacky In-Reply-To: <20070823190157.GA9896@freebsd.org> References: <786602c60708222346s9d45d45o6ff7b362d67fe938@mail.gmail.com> <20070823145000.tr2wulubs484ck0w@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070823190157.GA9896@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Stonehenge Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:41:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1187898075.1341.11.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:08:06 -0000 On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 21:01 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > let me clarify things a little. the 2.6 support in 7-current is good enough. > I am not aware of panics and the only "does not work because of 2.6" program > I know is java which I have sent a patch to kib@ to commit it (so it should > be in before 7.0R) Well, just for the record, Enemy Territory stopped working with 2.6 for me, but I can live with that (Doom 3 runs still fine, for example). On my -CURRENT desktop, I have 2.6 support enabled from the first day of commit and never plan to go back, not just for one game or even Java. >From the perspective of a common everyday desktop user, I'd call current 2.6 support "fine enough", and we are talking about 7.0 that's not even out yet. Anyway, good job, Roman and the rest of the team. Just my two pieces of a random currency. m. -- Michal Varga Stonehenge