From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 16 11:48:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scanner.secnap.net (scanner.secnap.net [216.241.67.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D220737B400 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:48:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (from scheidell@localhost) by scanner.secnap.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2GJmFq73439; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:48:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from scheidell) Message-Id: <200203161948.g2GJmFq73439@scanner.secnap.net> Subject: Re: Replacement for intel ISP1100 on FBSD 4.5? In-Reply-To: <20020316114314.R57379-100000@heaven.gigo.com> To: Jason Fesler Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:48:15 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Michael Scheidell X-Loop: scheidell@secnap.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL92 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > If you don't mind putting your own boxes together (or going through a > reseller that does), I"m finding the SBC2 Intel boards (aka, Coos Bay) are > working fairly well. F2 does work over serial; comes with dual nic built > in; running headless. Our configuration is 2U but half-depth. yah, thats what intel wants to put in the sr1200 and sr2100 they get as much for sbc2 motherboard (with no chip,ran,hd) as others get for full 1u rack computer. > > Only problem with PC hardware is that once you find something like, they > discontinue it :-/. I was having trouble finding PIII 850's fo rit anyway I like how they always tell me its for my own good, and runs windows just fine (does ANYTHING run windows just fine?) -- Michael Scheidell SECNAP Network Security, LLC (561) 368-9561 scheidell@secnap.net http://www.secnap.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message