From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 14:31:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A65106566C for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51DD8FC0C for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 14:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2010 09:31:11 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.8-GA) with ESMTP id LLR83922; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2010 09:31:12 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19347.47279.133670.627433@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:31:11 -0500 To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20100307084611.75b68f9e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20100305065837.660d3ebd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100305110049.GA10715@gmail.com> <20100305161210.GA46349@gmail.com> <20100306043513.GA1612@gmail.com> <03A86093-6B0C-429C-86CE-F73C0DEEC347@mac.com> <19346.24635.655335.807552@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20100307043004.GA3528@gmail.com> <20100307061025.a6d1c0de.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100307072957.GA8366@gmail.com> <20100307084611.75b68f9e.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Pongthep Kulkrisada , freebsd Mailing Subject: Re: Updating ports was Flash viewer for FBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:31:13 -0000 Polytropon writes: > > I am now thinking which one is better. > > I have used portupgrade / portinstall in the past, but I think > portmaster really is the way to go, at least for me, As far as I can tell, for 90-95% of tasks they're indistinguishable. If (generic) you have special needs - ugdating a large user base, extensive local patches, or a non-standard set of dependencies - then you're going to have to do the research and test them for yourself. And instructions for using portmaster are increasingly common in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Robert Huff