From owner-p4-projects Tue Dec 10 10:46:38 2002 Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 5C90437B404; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:46:37 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84BF37B401 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8245143EC2 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:46:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 28084 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Dec 2002 18:46:37 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:46:37 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: John Baldwin Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 22140 for review In-Reply-To: <200212101837.gBAIbfqE026165@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=22140 > Change 22140 by jhb@jhb_laptop on 2002/12/10 10:37:10 > > Add some hokie code to witness so that if we panic from spinning > too long on a spin lock, we try to use witness info to determine > where the other CPU acquired the lock in question. Would it make sense to leave this code out if WITNESS_SKIPSPIN is enabled? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message