From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 20:58:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BAB16A474 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C389613C44B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5BKwPFi086929; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:58:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5BKwPlx075956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:58:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200706112058.l5BKwPlx075956@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:57:04 -0400 To: Chuck Swiger From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <7F6FEDFB-EB48-4882-B033-5026EB037641@mac.com> References: <468d29450706110830k5faf022n9a417157bcf3f544@mail.gmail.com> <002b01c7ac50$6cd44400$467ccc00$@ca> <7F6FEDFB-EB48-4882-B033-5026EB037641@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DDoS in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE And Problen With The Clock X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:58:27 -0000 At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if >you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if >you weren't careful. :-) Hi, I thought DDoS = _Distributed_ Denial of Service where multiple attacking devices gang up to attack a host. Is your example not just a plain old Denial of Service (DoS) ? ---Mike