Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:51:48 +0100 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Thoughts about ports freeze Message-ID: <HqONuVcBJF@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <20021220001529.GC9963@vega.vega.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote, > Perhaps we could just branch out current state of the tree and unlock > it for normal use, while allow to commit onto the RE branch only after > getting portmgr's approval. Why just simply "tag" the tree? Retag the fixes needed for CURRENT on portmgr@ approval? Moving the tags can give us fine control withouth having to branch or freeze. I have 29 updates/committs in the queue, waiting for the freeze is over. Due to serveral request by users, I put thm online: http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/ports/ No offense, I know the problems, but I think the freeze is way to long. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?HqONuVcBJF>