From owner-freebsd-arch  Tue May 16 23:35:34 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EA0C537B54A; Tue, 16 May 2000 23:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA10460;
	Tue, 16 May 2000 23:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>
Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>,
	"Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>,
	Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: A new api for asynchronous task execution (2) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 May 2000 22:06:15 MDT."
             <200005170406.WAA22297@berserker.bsdi.com> 
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 23:38:02 -0700
Message-ID: <10449.958545482@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 	On a slightly related note. I see that putting prefixes on
> structure elements appears less common in FreeBSD than BSD/OS. Is
> this a conscience decision, or something that just happened because
> the compiler doesn't require it anymore? Actually anymore is a real

I'd certainly say the latter.  Not that one of our more motivated
committers couldn't go on a renaming rampage at some point to match
the current BSD/OS conventions, of course.  I can see your point about
it making the use of tools like cscope or global a bit easier.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message