Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, hsu@cs.hut.fi, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: pci bus and current?? Message-ID: <199509181916.MAA04397@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199509181226.FAA03560@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Sep 18, 95 05:25:43 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >>(How to make buffers larger to catch more of the messages in dmesg?) > > > >>Sep 17 02:30:12 router /kernel: 32(ffffff80) > >>Sep 17 02:30:12 router /kernel: map(24): mem32(ffffff80) > >>Sep 17 02:30:13 router /kernel: pci0:14: vendor=0xff80, device=0xffff [no driver > >> assigned] > >>... > > > >You would need an 8MB buffer :-). > > > >>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: ds0 attached > >>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: lo0 attached > >>Sep 17 02:30:23 router /kernel: bpf: ppp0 attached > >>... > >>Sep 17 02:30:29 router /kernel: bpf: ppp31 attached > >>Sep 17 02:30:29 router /kernel: bpf: sl0 attached > >>... > >>Sep 17 02:30:30 router /kernel: bpf: sl15 attached > >>Sep 17 02:30:30 router /kernel: bpf: tun0 attached > >>... > >>Sep 17 02:30:33 router /kernel: bpf: tun31 attached > > > >There are too man bpf messages and not enough messages for the individual > >pseudo-devices. > > I think we should kill the "bpf: xxn attached" messages completely. I know > I'm not alone in this thinking... Or perhaps reduce the noise level and simply output it during the if_attach as a ``bpf capable'': de0: DC21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.1 Ethernet address 00:00:c0:c5:f5:9d bpf -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509181916.MAA04397>