From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Feb  8 10:20:58 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from sir-alan.chem.indiana.edu (sir-alan.chem.indiana.edu [129.79.137.215])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBDC4161
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  8 Feb 2000 10:20:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from msquires@localhost)
	by sir-alan.chem.indiana.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA40682
	for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:21:40 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from msquires)
From: Mike Squires <msquires@sir-alan.chem.indiana.edu>
Message-Id: <200002081821.NAA40682@sir-alan.chem.indiana.edu>
Subject: kernel bug in 3.4-RELEASE or in samba 2.0.6?
To: FreeBSD ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:21:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

All versions of samba 2.0.6 I've tried under 3.4-RELEASE with either the
GENERIC or custom kernels are unable to allocate buffer space if that
option is used in smb.conf, i.e., the error

	lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(151)
	Failed to set socket option SO_SNDBUF (Error no buffer space available)

occurs for both the SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF options.

I tried the -current version of today, also.

This results in very slow file system performance, 400K/sec vs 2MB/sec on
an identical 3.3-RELEASE system.

Mike Squires


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message