From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 0:25:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018F637B406; Mon, 6 May 2002 00:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g467P5HX021132; Mon, 6 May 2002 09:25:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200205060725.g467P5HX021132@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <20020505172814.N39434-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> To: Dmitry Morozovsky Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 09:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sos@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hello there Soren, > > any chances patch for ata subsystem at > > date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45; > > that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R? If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message