From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 12:00:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124AF16A556 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CF943DC4 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:00:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBDC0MDS071927 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:00:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBDC0MEU071926; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:00:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:00:22 GMT Message-Id: <200512131200.jBDC0MEU071926@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9imun_Mikecin?= Cc: Subject: RE: ports/90312: [patch] www/mod_perl2: added support for www/apache22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9imun_Mikecin?= List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:00:51 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/90312; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9imun_Mikecin?= To: "Lars Eggert" , Cc: Subject: RE: ports/90312: [patch] www/mod_perl2: added support for www/apache22 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:51:24 +0100 Just like the maintainership of the port does not mean you will *always* take care of bugfixing, updating and resolving problems, I cannot be a tester whenever you make a change. Port maintanership is based on doing it on best-effort basis as time permits, so is my help with testing. Nobody is paid to do it. Beside maintaining a few ports, I do testing for other maintainers in the environment they cant do the testing themself. It is usually testing on different hardware or different architecture. It would be a very bad thing for them to have an attitude to refuse to support other architectures just because they can test it only on (for example) i386.