From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 10 19:37:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FD31B98;
 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B812C9E;
 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124])
 by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D06DB9A1;
 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:37:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: r256920 missing in stable/9 and releng/9.3
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:36:00 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; )
References: <37229F0A-4BEA-4712-9AE1-5446A630AF9F@transactionware.com>
 <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de>
 <CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201407101336.00965.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:37:38 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>,
 Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
 hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>,
 "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:37:39 -0000

On Monday, July 07, 2014 12:58:53 pm hiren panchasara wrote:
> + freebsd-net@,
>=20
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
> <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote:
> > Bez=C3=BCglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtim=
e):
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I=E2=80=99m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving =
our local=20
patches to 9.2 forward.
> >>
> >> I noticed that r256920 (changing sys/netinet/tcp_input.c) has not been=
=20
MFC=E2=80=99d. It was listed as =E2=80=9CMFC after 3 days=E2=80=9D back in =
October 2013.
> >>
> >> Is this patch missing for a reason?
> >
> > I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC?
>=20
> I also don't see any obvious reason.
>=20
> If nobody objects on -net@, I can do it.

I think this looks fine to merge.

=2D-=20
John Baldwin