From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 07:01:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83861106566B for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBC38FC1E for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1345 invoked by uid 399); 24 Sep 2010 07:01:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.142?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Sep 2010 07:01:49 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C9C4CDB.9000706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:01:47 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrej Zverev References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2a1pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/p5-Archive-Any pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Archive-SimpleExtractor pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Compress-LZF pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Compress-LZO pkg-plist ports/archivers/p5-Compress-LZW pkg-plist ports/archiver X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:01:51 -0000 On 9/23/2010 10:39 PM, Andrej Zverev wrote: > Log: > - only 13% of the p5- ports embed @comment $FreeBSD$: > so standarize and remove it > > How about to explain the benefits of this? Speaking only for myself ... 1. Standardization is a good thing since so much stuff is copy/pasted 2. The comments that were removed added no value, so 3. There was no harm in removing them. Philip may have additional/better answers. Do you have a specific concern about them being removed, or were you just curious? Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/