From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 07:45:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3566216A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:45:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [206.71.64.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9E343D31 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:45:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.247.57] (helo=[192.168.99.66]) by hobbiton.shire.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.10) id 1BfZlQ-000DYs-00 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:44:17 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <20040629181248.S54069@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20040629181248.S54069@carver.gumbysoft.com> Message-Id: <48048559-CA69-11D8-8BDD-003065A70D30@shire.net> From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:44:13 -0600 To: current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:45:21 -0000 On Jun 29, 2004, at 7:13 PM, Doug White wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote: > >> It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure >> what the >> laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of >> FreeBSD, >> it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 >> after >> already >> booting an OS. > > Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 > mode. > Thats one of the processor's features. :-) Does -CURRENT actually have this in it now? A while back the emulation stuff needed to run x86 binaries while in amd64 FreeBSD was not part of CURRENT and the comments were that it was too unstable... Thanks Chad who is running his Opterons in x86 FreeBSD because he needs java :-) > > You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of course.